Archive for November, 2005

30
Nov

Withdrawal From Iraq

In the latest edition of the New Yorker Seymour Hersh analyses the possibility and impact of a general US troop withdrawal in Iraq. Most frightening of all is the revelation that the US itself is taking the war into neighbouring countries:

“It’s a powder keg,” the Pentagon consultant said of the tactic. “But, if we hit an insurgent network in Iraq without hitting the guys in Syria who are part of it, the guys in Syria would get away. When you’re fighting an insurgency, you have to strike everywhere—and at once.”

Instead of bringing peace to Iraq, George W. Bush’s legacy might be having brought general political and social collapse to the whole region.

Daily Kos has a follow-up article, after Hersch appeared on Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer to discuss the New Yorker article.

Popularity: 9% [?]

30
Nov

Is Gravity Leaking From Our Universe?

A great article on the nature and possible origin of dark matter, reprinted from the The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Popularity: 7% [?]

29
Nov

Boris Johnson Returns From The Dark Side

I used to be a great fan of British MP and Spectator editor Boris Johnson. Politics aside, he generally comes across as a lovable buffoon, which I don’t mean to be negative in any way. Have I Got News For You was usually at its best with Boris as guest panelist, and an issue of GQ without a Boris Johnson motoring article is just sad. Then he put his foot in it by supporting the Iraq war, and he just wasn’t as lovable any more.

But times chance, and there’s always a chance of redemption for anyone with a self-deprecating approach to life. And so, welcome back to Boris Johnson, as this extract from an article on the Bush & Blair Bomb Al-Jazeera debacle on his website proves:

Then we heard about the Bush plan to blow up al-Jazeera.

Some of us feel that we have an abusive relationship with this war. Every time we get our hopes up, we get punched by some piece of bad news. We yearn to be told that we’re wrong, that things are going to get better, that the glass is half full. That’s why I would love to think that Dubya was just having one of his little frat-house wisecracks, when he talked of destroying the Qatar-based satellite TV station. Maybe he was only horsing around. Maybe it was a flippant one-liner, of the kind that he delivers before making one of his dramatic exits into the broom-closet. Perhaps it was a kind of Henry II moment: you know, who will rid me of this turbulent TV station? Maybe he had a burst of spacy Reagan-esque surrealism, like the time the old boy forgot that the mikes were switched on, and startled a press conference with the announcement that he was going to start bombing Russia in five minutes. Maybe Bush thought he was Kenny Everett. Perhaps he was playing Basil Brush. Boom boom.

Who knows? But if his remarks were just an innocent piece of cretinism, then why in the name of holy thunder has the British state decreed that anyone printing those remarks will be sent to prison?

Welcome back to sanity, Boris!

Popularity: 8% [?]

29
Nov

Beauty is relative


Beauty is relative
Originally uploaded by True_Bavarian.

Every now and then I stumble upon a truly great photograph on Flickr. This is such a photograph, by a Flickr user called True Bavarian. It’s not—as you would imagine—a look of intelligence that makes this ape look human, but a look of utter and absolute stupidity that reminds me of the worst in so many of the members of my species. Should he ever wish to jump to our branch of the evolutionary tree, he has my vote!

Popularity: 28% [?]

19
Nov

More Miss Translations

Following on my marginal obsession with bad translation on Flemish television, here are some more horrible mistakes recently spotted in subtitles on Belgian television:

The phrase “humor the guy” is translated into Dutch as “een paar grappen vertellen” (telling a few jokes). Different humour, guys and girls, different humour.

In the Simpsons, on VT4: “104-year old man” is miss-translated as “140-year old man”. Just a typo, of course, but of the kind that catapults simple old age into the realms of science fiction and the absurd.

Most painful of all, in a series entitled Reynebeau & Rotten on the “quality” channel Canvas—a travelogue where Flemish historian Marc Reynebeau travels around the United Kingdom with John Lydon (better known as the Sex Pistol Johnny Rotten)—the phrase “Wagnerian opera” is subtitled as “Bulgaarse opera” (Bulgarian opera).

Popularity: 15% [?]

17
Nov

Internacia Televido

Internacia Televido offers television in Esperanto, because… well, why not? The Internet-based broadcasters aim to offer “news, sports, interviews, variety shows, music, cinema, exotic cultures and cuisine”. All fine and well, but presumably there aren’t that many existing material to choose from. How many movies have been made in Esperanto, apart from the excellent Incubus with William Shatner?

Popularity: 12% [?]

15
Nov

Reading Rites

I love taking cheap shots at badly written online publications (quite frequently leaving myself wide open for the same criticism), but you just have to love this mistake in the Belgian version of Expatica (in an article on voting rights for non-EU citizens, actually blog-worthy in its own right):

The Flemish government will compile a document outlining the practicalities of how voters can register for the elections. The text will be written in every EU and non-EU language.

At last, the Klingon and Elvish reading public will be disenfranchised no more.

Popularity: 10% [?]

08
Nov

John Fowles (1926 - 2005)

John Fowles, intellectual, existentialist and misanthrope, is no more. His novels The Collector and The Magus rank as some of the more remarkable literary influences in my life, and his impact on English literature is undeniable. According to the Wikipedia “most critics have considered John Fowles as a well reputed forefather of British postmodernism”.

From an interview with the Guardian:

No one in my family had any literary interests or skills at all. I seemed to come from nowhere. I didn’t really have a happy childhood. What bored me about my mother was her lack of taste. My father’s great fault was that he hated France from his experiences in the war, at Ypres. And he liked Germany. We had a geographical falling out. I deviated at the wrong branch of European culture. When I was a young boy my parents were always laughing at “the fellow who couldn’t draw” – Picasso. Their crassness horrified me.

Was his father an intellectual? ‘No’, Fowles snorts with contempt: ‘he was a tobacconist’.

His epitath is probably best dictated in the Guardian interview:

I wish I knew more. But that’s a matter of luck. I don’t spend much time in self-loathing or self-admiration. I have a great deal of contempt for writers who are vain, who want fame. You do have to have a certain amount of vanity to be successful, to sell books. But you have to keep it under control, you can’t take yourself too seriously or you become what you pretend to despise.

The Times and the Telegraph both have obituaries on an author who will be sorely missed.

Popularity: 11% [?]

03
Nov

Al Copley’s Radio Play

One of the all time great blues pianists (although he would probably hate me pigeonholing him like that!) has just released a new album. Al Copley’s new jewel is called Radio Play (MP3 previews of all the tracks are available on his site, and as usual it’s a delight for fans of blues piano, jump music, swing, rockabilly or barrelhouse (and probably several dozen genres more, if you care to go on) with a surprisingly strong big band theme. My favourite two tracks on the album have to be Nightmare (a brilliant adaptation of Artie Shore’s classic – you can listen to an MP3 sample here on Al’s website) and On The Dock Of The Bay (a cover of the Otis Redding song – MP3 sample here). As a special pre-Christmas treat, you can buy the album on his website before it’s released to the general public.

Popularity: 13% [?]

03
Nov

Google Print: The End

What on earth are Google up to with Google Print? They are apparently scared witless by the legal threats of the publishing industry, and are alienating the very people who might support the project.

A case in point: Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. First published in 1859, this book is as public domain as public domain can get. Project Gutenberg has had a copy available online for some years now, among several other works by Darwin.

So let us turn to Google Print, who have as their stated ambition to “organize the world’s information” and of “putting book content where you can find it most easily”. Great idea. So we ask a pertinent question: “Can I read an entire library book online?”

And Google have an anwser for this:

If the book has no copyright restrictions and is considered public domain, then you can browse through the entire book. For library books still under copyright, you’ll only be able to see a few sentences. Books that are from publishers will allow you to view a limited number of pages. In general, Google Print is designed to help you discover books, not read them from start to finish. It’s like going to a bookstore and browsing – only with a Google twist.

Fair enough. Even if the intention is not for books to be read from start to finish, they probably wouldn’t mind if we do for books clearly in the public domain. So we try and find our good friend Charlie Darwin’s The Origin of Species:

Books 1 – 100 with 145000 pages on The Origin of Species.

Goodie. Most of these results are clearly references and bibliographies, but we start off with the Signet Classic reprint of 2003. Public domain text, but the book itself is copyrighted, so we can just see a few pages. “Like going to a bookstore and browsing”, as Google said.

But where are the original copies of Darwin’s book? Certainly the universities have several copies lying around, something unhindered by copyright? Isn’t that what univeristy libraries are for, sharing information?

While searching for Darwin we find Benjamin G. Ferris’s A New Theory of the Origin of Species. Not in the least comparable to Darwin’s work, but this was published in 1883, so after more than 120 years no country in the world would claim the book to be covered by copyright.

But what’s this? We see only a scrap of paper with some text on it, Google’s tribute to literal design. “Where’s the rest of this book?” And Google answers:

Library books still in copyright: For books that we have scanned from a library which are still in copyright, you will only be able to view the bibliographic information and a few short sentences of text around your search term.

Clearly this is rubbish. 120 years after it was published, and 114 years after the death of the author (he apparently died in 1891) this book is very much in the public domain.

Which means that, in their effort to appease the publishing industry, all Google have given us is a glorified Amazon.

Popularity: 7% [?]




November 2005
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Blogroll

Badge Farm

  • Firefox 2
  • Powered by Redoable 1.2
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Feeds burnt by Feedburner