Archive for January, 2008

15
Jan

9/11 Fire in the Sky

Conspiracy theories are notoriously vulnerable to straw man arguments. Think you’ve seen an unidentified object in the sky? An unidentified flying object? Watch me turn you into a Roswell-dwelling, lights in the sky, lizards in the White House stereotype of the UFO wingnut kind. Watch me transform you from an educated, reasonable human being with a question into a laughable mess of paranoia and idiocy.

It’s just that easy.

Of course, it shouldn’t be. Burning straw men are fun for the whole family, but it’s the coward’s way out when you can’t or won’t address the fundamental questions behind an issue.

The 9/11 conspiracy movement is a case in point. Many of the people crying conspiracy and cover-up are undoubtedly ideal straw men, clichéd loners who spend their time arguing semantics on the Net and scrutinizing badly compressed amateur video for artefacts that fit poorly defined patterns. Many no doubt have a pre-existing beef with the United States government, and don’t trust any kind of authority at all. But some conspiracy theorists aren’t as neatly defined.

Take Robert M. Bowman as an example. He’s about 73 years old, so old enough to know better but not old enough to be accused of going senile. A Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Air Force, so we can probably assume he doesn’t have a problem with authority. With a Ph.D. in Aeronautics, Robert Bowman appears to be an all-round intelligent and upstanding American citizen. And Robert Bowman rejects the official account of what happened in the skies of America on 11 September 2001.

The “conspiracy theory”, as the official explanation of what happened has ironically come to be called, asserts that a group of Muslim terrorists planned and executed several attacks on American targets using hijacked commercial airliners. The impact of these airliners on various targets caused massive damage and loss of life, including structural damage to the Pentagon and the total collapse of several buildings in New York City.

A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. – Lt. Col. Robert M. Bowman, Ph.D., U.S. Air Force (retired)

And indeed, this is how a very large number of non-stereotypical conspiracy theorists feel. Perhaps the “facts” surrounding the tragedy of 9/11 are 80% true. Or even 90%. But there are questions which remain unanswered.

Now a group of 25 “former U.S. military officers”, among them Robert Bowman, have stepped forward to ask for a new investigation of exactly what did happen on that day.

I’m an old interceptor pilot. I know the drill. I’ve done it. I know how long it takes. I know the rules. … Critics of the government story on 9/11 have said: “Well, they knew about this, and they did nothing”. That’s not true. If our government had done nothing that day and let normal procedure be followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. – Lt. Col. Robert M. Bowman, Ph.D., U.S. Air Force (retired)

True skeptics have to keep an open mind. Deciding there’s a government cover-up and then searching for circumstantial evidence to back it up won’t wash. But a true skeptic has the stomach to face unpleasant questions, even when it might conflict with previously held beliefs.

As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there. – Capt. Daniel Davis, former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine Engine Division, founder and CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp.

If the basic holes in the plot of what happened on 11 September 2001 were addressed, only the lunatic fringe would be left. But because these very reasonable questions and assertions have never quite been resolved, they linger on in the minds of people who would not otherwise entertain ideas of government conspiracies.

At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757s and 767s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described. – Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy pilot (retired)

The list goes on and on and on. 25 men and women, and not a single straw man to be torn down among them. How long will it take before the mainstream media also asks these questions in a non-sensationalist context?

Popularity: 37% [?]

11
Jan

Cannabis Can-o-worms?

An overly alarmist and painfully uninformed article in the Telegraph caught my attention this morning. It’s a long article, on the apparently obvious and demonstrable dangers lurking in changes in drug legislation in Britain, but basically boils down to a small chicken running in circles and predicting that heavenly objects (or the heavens in their entirety) are about to come crashing down.

Since cannabis was downgraded from a Class B to a Class C drug, the number of adults being treated in hospitals and clinics in England for its effects has risen to more than 16,500 a year.

This just doesn’t make sense. What effects are these that hospitalised 16,500 people? Attempting to rent really bad kung fu movies? Giggling incessantly for 5 minutes without knowing exactly why? Which effect directly caused by using cannabis can possibly involve a visit to the A&E room? Over-zealous probing by a police officer performing a body cavity search?

And here we have our answer:

Doctors say cannabis abuse can contribute to mental health problems including forms of psychosis, paranoia and schizophrenia.

But so can the Beatles. Just ask Charles Manson. And so can Jodie Foster, according to John Hinckley. Apparently, so can pretty much anything, including alcohol and cold medication. But cannabis can only trigger psychosis in people who already have a small short in their neural wiring, it doesn’t cause psychosis on its own.

Should the focus not be on identifying people (especially teenagers) who are predisposed to psychotic incidents? (And yes, America, I’m specifically looking at you with your gun-toting teen hit men here.) If cannabis doesn’t trigger their psychosis, some other drug (like alcohol) could. In fact, I would love to see some British statistics on psychotic incidents caused by cannabis contrasted with psychotic incidents caused by alcohol. Oh, sorry, my mistake. The crowds of people beating the crap out of each other on the streets of Britain aren’t psychotic, they’re just drunk.

There can be harmful physical side-effects, disrupting blood pressure and exacerbating heart and circulation disorders.

What, smoking’s bad for you now? Duh. But that’s smoking in itself, regardless of what you’re smoking. It’s not healthy. If you have to make a choice between smoking cannabis and eating an apple, you should probably be eating the apple. On the other hand, if you can smoke the cannabis and save your apple for when the munchies kick in, that’s cool too.
Elizabeth Burton-Phillips, a leading campaigner on drug issues since her son, Nick Mills, killed himself in despair at his addiction four years ago[...]

In response, Anton Raath, an unreasonable geek with an apparent axe to grind, said, “nuts to you lady”. Being a leading campaigner on anything does not qualify you for something. Losing a child is horrible, but not a distinction either.

“Hi, my daughter fell of a cliff, can I lecture you on the pernicious nature of gravity?”

I don’t know Nick Mills’s background. I don’t know how he died, where he died, when he died. I do know one thing: cannabis did not kill him. Despair did not kill him either. He killed himself, either because he was a rational human being who made a rational decision to end his life, or because he was a non-rational person (temporarily) incapable of making rational decisions, and his family and friends failed him by not protecting him against himself.

I cannot to see how a mother’s grief at losing her son and failing to get him the help he so obviously needed relates to any constructive discussion on the dangers of cannabis.

(OK, I lied about not knowing anything about Nick Mills. Of course I Googled his name. It turns out he was addicted to heroin, a drug pharmacologically and socially as far removed from cannabis as prime rib is from roadkill. I’m sure Elizabeth Burton-Phillips means well, but if she or her Foundation don’t see this difference, I can’t imagine them doing much good in drug advocacy.)

The figures suggest health authorities are treating more people for cannabis abuse than there are patients who have heart bypass operations or treatment for colon cancer.

Of course, people who have heart bypass operations or treatment for colon cancer are easy to identify. They have heart bypass operations or treatment for colon cancer. To get back to an earlier point: what the hell are all those people suffering from the effects of cannabis treated for? Surely they can’t all be suffering psychotic episodes? Not all 16,500 of them? If you eat a dog turd under the impression it’s a Mars bar, or burn your fingers trying to squeeze the last goodness out of a roach, or simply suspect you’re being watched by some bloke in some house on some street, do you really require treatment by a real doctor?

It’s a sad reflection on society that villagers brandishing pitchforks still represent the highest levels of public debate. Wouldn’t it be nice to sit down around a table and discuss issues in a rational way like the mostly hairless primates we are?

Popularity: 40% [?]

09
Jan

Niggy Tardust and the Freeloaders from Mars

Chris Anderson at The Long Tail does an excellent job of dissecting the financial merits of a Trent Reznor experiment. Trent did a Radiohead and released an album (by Saul Williams, not one of his own) in both free and paid versions. The $5 version had better sound quality, and both were available by download only. But the fact that only 20% of people who downloaded the album opted for the $5 version miffed him no end, and he was quick in pointing out that sales were much lower on this album than on Williams’s previous offering.

However, according to Chris Anderson’s calculations, sales of Williams’s The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of Niggy Tardust came to $141,610. Based on figures cooked up by David Byrne, Williams would have received the princely sum of $54,235 for his previous album. More units sold, less money in the bank. Deduct from $141,610 the cost of producing the album, I would guess there’s still at least $50,000 left with Williams’s name on it.

And the pleasure of tweaking the tails of the record industry lions Reznor dislikes so much, surely that must be worth a dollar or two?

Popularity: 60% [?]

08
Jan

Knuts To Nuremberg

Shortly after a Nuremberg Zoo announcement that recently born polar bear cubs will be left to die if their mothers abandon them, the two cubs are apparently dead. The decision not to interfere was prompted by a recent (controversial) decision by the Berlin Zoo to hand rear Knut, a polar bear cub abandoned by its mother. The Nuremberg zookeepers, according to a BBC News report, believe in letting “nature take its course”. An incredible load of sanctimonious bollocks, coming from a zoo.

What exactly happened to the cubs remains unclear, at least according to Spiegel Online.

Nuremberg Zoo said polar bear Vilma had probably eaten the two cubs, born five weeks ago. “The cubs probably died after contracting a disease,” the zoo said in a statement released on Monday.

So the cubs were eaten, or died of disease, or died of disease and were then eaten. Aliens or the CIA are not believed to be involved.

As for letting nature take its course, can there be anything less logical and more greenly feeble German? If rapists and paedophiles are biologically predisposed to be rapists or paedophiles, should nature simply take its course? Humans living off a natural diet of fish are decimating stocks in the North Sea, so should we impose controls or simply let nature take its course?

The answer, obviously, is that we don’t let nature take its course, because while technically still animals humans are a particularly clever kind of animal. Not only are we one of the most sympathetic species on this planet (when we want to be, at least), we’re also one of the very few species able to act on our instincts of kindness and make this planet a better place. Rather than leaving the sick and infirm to die because it’s natural, we care for them and share our resources.

Letting nature take its course is something to expect of the lower order primates, not of humans capable of thought and action.

Popularity: 33% [?]

03
Jan

Shock & Horror, Not Everything On Facebook Is 100% True!

The BBC reports that Facebook have shut down two fake profiles of Bilawal Bhutto, son of Benazir Bhutto. Sadly, the swift action came too late to save a “number of news organisations” from making the usual asses of themselves by indiscriminately reporting anything they find online as the truth. “Facts” sourced from the Facebook profiles were reported as… well… facts.

Perhaps journalists able to say “I found it on Facebook” should not be allowed to call themselves journalists at all.

Popularity: 100% [?]

03
Jan

Are Atheists Fit to be Parents?

Not according to Superior Court Judge William Camarata. Citing a clause from the New Jersey state constitution which states that “no person shall be deprived of the inestimable privilege of worshiping Almighty God in a manner agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience”, the state refused an otherwise perfectly eligible couple the right to adopt a baby girl.

Does this dictate apply to Buddhists and Hindus? Would the situation have been different if the couple were Pastafarians?

Read the full article in TIME.

Popularity: 25% [?]




January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Blogroll

Badge Farm

  • Firefox 2
  • Powered by Redoable 1.2
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Feeds burnt by Feedburner